Hermeticism: The Awful Truth

Discovering the Extent of the Problem

I learned the word Hermeticism recently.

Here’s an extended simile of what my experience was like in doing a deep dive on this word.

Imagine that your drain keeps backing up. You take a look, and discover a root. You have to find at what point the roots are coming into the pipe, so you do the roto-rooter thing. It turns out that the roots are running through the pipe all the way down to the street and across the street and into the vacant lot, where there is a huge tree.

And oh, look, it’s already pulled down the neighbor’s house!

That’s what it was like. (Oh, no! It’s in my George MacDonald pipe too!)

What Methought I Knew

I’ve listened to a number of James Lindsay podcasts, and he talks a lot about Hegel. In discussing what exactly went wrong with the train wreck that is modern education and politics, James has to dive deep into quite a few unpleasant philosophers, among them Herbert Marcuse, Jaques Derrida, Paolo Friere, and the postmodernists. And Hegel.

I had heard James describe before how Hegel saw the world. Hegel had this idea that progress is reached by opposite things colliding and out of them comes a new synthesis, and then that synthesis has to collide with its opposite and so on until perfection is reached. This process is called the dialectic. Marx took these ideas and applied them to society, where there has to be conflict and revolution, but then the new society that emerges isn’t perfect yet and so there has to be another revolution and so on until everything is perfect and/or everyone is dead.

Obviously I am simplifying a lot. James can talk about this stuff for an hour and he is simplifying too, not because these ideas are themselves complicated but because Hegel produced a huge dump of words, and he came up with terminology that tried to combine his ideas with Christian concepts so that they would be accepted in his era. Anyway, the word dialectic is still used by postmodern writers like Kimberle Crenshaw, and it is a clue that they think constant revolution is the way to bring about utopia.

So, I was familiar with Hegel through the podcasts of Lindsay, and I was also familiar enough with Gnostic thought to at least recognize it when it goes by, as it so often does. For one thing, you kind of have to learn a little bit about Gnosticism if you are a serious Christian, because gnostic (or at least pre-gnostic: Platonic, mystery religion) ideas were very much in the air in New Testament times, and many of the letters of the New Testament were written to refute these ideas. Also, Gnosticism, particularly the mind/body duality, has had such an influence on our culture that it’s hard to miss. It’s present in New Age and neopagan thought, and it’s called out in Nancy Pearcey’s book Love Thy Body for the bad effects it has had on the way we conceive of personhood.

So that’s the background.

Several months ago, I was listening to Lindsay give a talk summarizing his recent research to a church group. He was talking about theologies: systems of thought that make metaphysical and cosmological claims, and come with moral imperatives. And he dashed off this summary, something like the following:

“You could have a theology where at first all that exists is God, but He doesn’t know Himself as God, so in order to know Himself he creates all these other beings, and they are all like pieces of God but they don’t know it, and their task is to become enlightened and realize that they, too, are God, and when they realize this, eventually they will all come back together, but now God is self-conscious because of the process of breaking He’s been through.”

And I’m thinking, Sounds like Pantheism, or maybe Gnosticism.

And James says, “That’s the Hermetic theology.”

And I’ve got a new word to research.

Kind of a Weird Name

So, why is it called Hermeticism? Does it have to do with hermits?

My first foray into Internet Hermeticism immediately showed that the school of thought was named for a guy named Hermes, as in this paragraph from wiki:

Hermeticism, or Hermetism, is a label used to designate a philosophical system that is primarily based on the purported teachings of Hermes Trismegistus (a legendary Hellenistic combination of the Greek god Hermes and the Egyptian god Thoth).[1] These teachings are contained in the various writings attributed to Hermes (the Hermetica), which were produced over a period spanning many centuries (c. 300 BCE – 1200 CE), and may be very different in content and scope.[2]


One of my search hits, I can’t remember which one, said that Hermeticism is “often confused with Gnosticism.” O.K., so if it’s not Gnosticism, that means I know less than I thought and it’s all the more reason to research.

I also found avowedly Hermetic web sites like Hermetic World, whose “summary” is actually more of an attempt to draw you into their movement:

Hermeticism – The secret knowledge

Hermeticism is an ancient secret doctrine that dates back to early Egypt and its innermost knowledge has always been passed on only orally. In each generation there have been some faithful souls in different countries of the world who received the light, carefully cultivated it and did not allow it to be extinguished. Thanks to these strong hearts, these fearless spirits, truth has not been lost. It was always passed on from master to disciple, from adept to neophyte from mouth to ear. The terms “hermetically sealed”, “hermetically locked”, and so on, derive from this tradition and indicate that the general public does not have access to these teachings.

Hermeticism is a key that gives people the possibility to achieve everything they desire deep in their hearts, to develop a profound understanding of life, to become capable of decision making and responsibility; and to answer the question of meaning. Hermeticism offers a hidden key to unfolding.

Nobody can teach this knowledge to himself. Even in competent books like Kybalion, the teaching is only passed on in a veiled way. It always requires a master to pass on the wisdom to the able student. Today, as in the past, authentic mystery schools are a way to acquire this knowledge. The Hermetic Academy is one of these authentic schools.


This is certainly the genuine article, but it is perhaps not the first place to go. I wanted to learn about the basic doctrines from a neutral source, simply and clearly described. I didn’t want to have to wade through a bunch of hand-waving to get there, at least not at first. Still, I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised that Hermetic World tries to cast a mysterious, esoteric, yet somewhat self-help-y atmosphere on their first page. After all, it is a mystery religion.

Well, at least now I know why it’s called Hermeticism. It’s basically an accident of history, due to the name of the guy to whom the founding writings were attributed.

Time to move on to a book.

Moving On to a Book

I am fortunate to be descended from a scholar who has a large personal library, heavy on the theology.

I asked my dad.

Serendipitiously, he had just finished reading Michael J. McClymond’s two-volume history of Christian universalism (the doctrine that everyone is going to heaven), and he remembered that Hermeticism entered into the discussion. He was happy to lend it to me. You can see all the places I’ve marked with tabs. Those are just the ones where Hermeticism is directly mentioned. I hope you now understand my dilemma.

In McClymond’s Appendix A: Gnosis and Western Esotericism: Definitions and Lineages, I found at last the succinct, neutral summary I was looking for:

[“Hermetism”] as used by academics refers to persons, texts, ideas, and practices that are directly linked to the Corpus Hermeticum, a relatively small body of texts that appeared most likely in Egypt during the second or third centuries CE. … “Hermeticism” is often used in a wider way to refer to the general style of thinking that one finds in the Corpus Hermeticum and other works of ancient gnosis, alchemy, Kabbalah, and so forth. “Hermeticism” sometimes functions as a synonym for “esotericism.” The adjective “Hermetic” is ambiguous, since it can refer either to “Hermetism” or “Hermeticism.”

McClymond, p. 1072


So it isn’t that different from Gnosticism after all.

“Esoteric,” by the way, means an emphasis on hidden or mystical knowledge that is not available to everyone and/or cannot be reduced to words and propositions. “Exoteric” refers to the style of theology that puts emphasis on knowledge that is public in the sense that it is written down somewhere, asserts something concrete, can be debated, etc.

Even though I have literally just found an actual definition of the word that is clear enough to put into a blog post, in the time it took me to find this definition I feel that I have already gotten a pretty good sense of what this philosophy is like. Perhaps it helps that it has pervaded many, many aspects of our culture, so I have encountered it many times before, as no doubt have you.

I began to peruse the tabs in the volumes above and read the sections there, in all their awful glory.

Yep, James Lindsay in fact did a pretty good job of explaining the core metaphysic of Hermeticism. Of course, this philosophy brings a lot of things with it that he didn’t get into. If we and all beings in the universe are all made of the same spiritual stuff as God Himself, it follows that alchemy should work (getting spiritual results with physical processes and the other way round). It follows that astrology should work (everything is connected, and the stars and men and the gods not only all influence each other, but when you get down to it are actually the same thing). It follows that reincarnation should be a thing (the body is just a shell or an illusion that is occupied by the spirit, the spark of God). It follows that there are many paths to God, since we are all manifestations of God and will all eventually return to Him/It. It follows that the body is not that important (in some versions of this philosophy, matter is actually evil). Therefore we should be able to physically heal ourselves with our minds. Our personhood should be unconnected to (some might say unfettered by) our body, such that we can be born in the wrong body, or we can change our sex or our species if we want to. There might also be bodies that don’t have souls yet (such as unborn babies), and so it would be no wrong to destroy them. Also, since matter is not really a real thing, it follows that Jesus was not really incarnated in a real human body and that He only appeared to do things like sleep, eat, suffer, and die. Also, since we are all parts of God like He is, He is not really one with God in any sense that is unique, but just more of an example of a really enlightened person who realized just how one with God He was.

I imagine that about twenty pop culture bells have gone off in your mind as you read that preceding paragraph. You might also have been reminded of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints, which teaches that we were all pre-existent souls literally fathered by God out of some sort of spiritual matter before we came to earth to be born.

So, What the Heck Is It?

Hermeticism is not just one thing. It’s a whole human tradition of thought. It had a lot of streams flowing into it, like Plato, first-century mystery religions, Gnosticism, and early attempts to reconcile Christianity with these things. It has a lot of streams flowing out of it, like many Christian mystics of varying degrees of Christian-ness; Origen; Bohme; Hegel; medieval and Renaissance alchemy; the Romantic literary movement; Mormonism; New Age thinking; identity politics; transhumanism; Shirley McLaine; The Secret, and the movie Phenomenon.

Not all of these thinkers hold to the exact same set of doctrines. In a big philosophical movement like this, almost every serious thinker is going to have his or her own specific formulation that differs from everyone else’s in ways that seem really important to people on the inside of the system. So anyone who is an insider or who has made it their life’s work to research any of the things I mention above (and many others besides) could come along and point out errors or overgeneralizations in this article and make me look like I don’t know anything. That’s partly because it’s a huge historical phenomenon and I actually don’t know much of all there is to know. It’s also partly because these mystery religions delight in making things complicated. They love to add rituals and symbols and secret names and to discover new additional deities that are personifications of abstract ideas like Wisdom. It’s supposed to be esoteric. That’s part of the fun.

Another reason it’s difficult to describe Hermeticism accurately is that when all is one, it is really difficult to talk about anything. In this view of the world, when you get right down to it there is no distinction between spirit and matter, creator and creature, man and woman, conscious and inanimate, and the list goes on. I called it Hermeticism at the beginning of this paragraph, but I was tempted to write Hermeticism/Gnosticism, or perhaps Hermeticism/Gnosticism/alchemy/mystery religions/the New Age/Pantheism/postmodernism. If you’ve ever read any New Age writers, you’ll notice that they tend to write important terms with slashes like that (“Sophia/the divine feminine”). That’s because it’s all one. They don’t want you to forget that. They don’t want to forget it. Even if these ideas do not go very well with the human mind, and they tend to break it if you keep trying to think them.

In a sense, Hermeticism and all these other related movements are very diverse and not the same at all. In another sense, it’s all … the same … crap.

23 thoughts on “Hermeticism: The Awful Truth

  1. Chris Schallert, Idea Engine

    Doing the hard work of research so we don’t have to. Bless you and thank you.

    Sadly, this confirms my half-educated suspicions of new age philosophy. It’s all just humans trying to become divine, play-acting at supernal thought, pretending to be as wise as God, and falling, unsurprisingly and unentertainingly, short.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Anna

    listen to James Lindsay podcasts too. I like how he breaks everything down in a way that you can see where all these ideas connect.

    All this these ideas you talk about in this post, they all sound cultish. I can think of many things in society that reflect these ideas.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. So you’re going to continue diving deeper. Might I recommend actually reading the works of Hermes Trismegistus as a frame of reference. The Corpus Hermeticum is heady but it looks like you can wade through those waters easily enough. New Age wuwu types horrendously misrepresent western esotericism. Oddly enough, Isaac Newton wrote a ton of literature on the subject. (alchemy derived from hermetic philosophy)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Sure! If I come across it, I’ll dip in.

      I am skeptical of any claim that anyone in this very broad stream of thought misrepresents other parts of the stream. I mean, I am sure they do, but that is sort of the point, that each teacher has their own very personal interpretation and synthesis and special meanings for the different terms. I had this neopagan friend years ago, and she loved to complain that her religion had been cruelly misrepresented. But then she kept changing it, too, and it kept getting darker until finally, she was proudly claiming the things that she had once said were misrepresentations.

      This might seem random, and I’m sure you’ll say there’s not much point if they are not original sources, but here are a few things I’ve read that draw heavily on esoteric philosophy: The Gods in Every Man, The Highly Sensitive Person (one or two chapters are very Jungian), Why Does He DO That (about domestic abuse, but again, the author is very Jungian), the works of George MacDonald, Harry Potter’s Bookshelf by John Granger (includes lots of discussion of alchemy). I am currently working my way through the Book of Enoch, and this summer I listened to a podcast about Gnosticism by Michael Heiser that must have been 4 hours long. Oh yeah, plus of course the Romantic authors. Emile by Rousseau. And Plato’s Republic. I realize I am just getting started.

      And it doesn’t surprise me that Newton was into this. It is everywhere. Just the other day, Ben Shapiro (an orthodox Jew) gave his explanation of how he understands the afterlife, and it was 100% pure Hermeticism.

      Thanks for stopping by!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Sorry. Was with my spiritual It’s so rare you find someone who can run the gamut on this sort of thing who recognizes all of the threads running through a school of philosophy or their interpretations. Enoch is good fun. Hekhalot is such an interesting form of spiritual discipline.

        The bit about Shapiro doesn’t shock me. Kabbalah and hermeticism are twin flames in so many ways. That’s also what makes it about as confusing as Gnosticism to grasp. All three of them are highly subjective and based on intense spiritual discipline or meditations. Think of Plato’s cave allegory from the Republic. “What do you mean I have to go inward to understand the outer world?” Or C.S. Lewis’a “inwards and upwards” bit. It’s almost like no one has found a universal language for the inward journey. Symbolism, twilight languages, polysemic diatribes for dayyyys! 😂 it’s so fun to decode though.

        Liked by 1 person

          1. Unfortunately I am already familiar with the stories from Sumer. It’s Ishtar carved into my altar, not Sophia. But thank you for seeing discord amongst those of us who were having a harmonious conversation. Glad you’re so “knowledgeable.”

            Liked by 1 person

          2. hally369

            The comment wasn’t meant for you.. It was for the author, while writing seemed to be making statements that were not true. If I read it wrong, my bad.
            I can tell you know what you are talking about;)

            Liked by 1 person

          3. hally369

            Omg, ignore this comment, I was reading a blog, and someone decided to persecute others who didn’t have the same opinion as them wasn’t being cool. I didn’t realize I opened this blog, and then commented on the wrong subject, my apologies..


          4. They’re scholars dude. They have a very different perspective on ancient texts. It’s not wrong. It’s just different. Like, would we bother arguing the finer points of bridal mysticism with Evangelicals? Probably not as there’s no point.

            Also, a hot take- it looks like she wrote this piece after a weekend of study as there are several points where she stops to reflect on other schools of thought with similar ideas while familiarizing herself with hermetic texts.

            All scholars bring their biases in yes but what we’re more than likely seeing is someone firing from the hip after a weekend of meticulous research. Of course there’s mistakes. Imagine writing a piece after reading Timothy Freke on a Friday night and tying it into, say… your own understanding of esotericism. That’s what we’re looking at. But.. she’s obviously educated and will undoubtedly write more pieces based on further research. It takes years to unearth the wisdom of Kemet and Sumer and tie them together. Even then; we’re fighting decades of mistranslations and conventional understandings that eat at a lot of people’s sensibilities.

            What’s your site btw? I want to read your posts. It’ll take time as I’m at work alone but still…

            Liked by 1 person

          5. Dude I doubt even experts can narrow down hermeticism. Your initial feeling of it being similar to Gnosticism and varying wildly based on teachers rings true. I say this while staring at the hermetic cross etched into my meditation space knowing there’s at least 12 different explanations for its symbolism alone.

            I was personally impressed anyone could cover that much ground in a limited timeframe. Besides, what good does arguing over any of this actually do. We’re all nerds who enjoy reading various topics at the end of the day.

            Liked by 1 person

          6. hally369

            I don’t have a site yet. Honestly, I’m swamped, and unfortunately, I need to set it up. Thx for the reminder. Have a great day..

            Liked by 1 person

  4. hally369

    I’m an A. I cut into the reality of confirmation bias, and how easy it is to bend any information, truth, or lie in your favor. ( actually, your Ego’s favor, which is not really your fault due to the fact that the soil you are born onto will result in 95% of ‘your beliefs’ due to the people who raised you.)
    Before you decide to tackle any subject I would suggest doing so with the knowledge of your ingrained biases, ones that you don’t see, most of us don’t. It is not written in the human narratives to think for oneself, or disagree with the people who love us the most.
    Gnostics laugh at astrology, along with anyone else who knows that astrology,( whatever it was in 4000 B.C.) was lost. Astrology is a modern take on bits and pieces of information collected, put together, and agreed upon. If some individuals partake in it I’m not going to judge them, or think I’m superior to them because I’m not.

    If we can agree that G*d is an all-loving source, unconditional love, creation, the spiritual force of all life, joy, and peace. I have to ask, why are you picking up pieces of information that only boost your Ego in the defense of the religion you follow? When did the unconstitutional love sway, and humankind became blasphemers, misinformed by information that another individual says is wrong, and unholy?
    Is this G*d? We must be acquainted with different types, and that is perfectly fine. God is love, think about it. I wish you light and tenderness, and may God truly bless you.
    Just a person who has read too much…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s