I Really Do Love Lucy

(Don’t cry, Lucy, I love you!)

I Love Lucy is one of those shows that everybody feels like they’ve seen, even if they haven’t. Or perhaps they have only seen one or two episodes, such as the famous Vitameatavegamin episode:

(This one was not her fault. The “medicine” had a high alcohol content.)

That was me until recently. I started watching it with my kids because in our chronological study of history, after several years of study we have made it up to the 1950s and 60s.

The first episode came out the year my parents were born. Now, their grandkids, of the generation that loves Anime, Minecraft, and Mario, watch it and they enjoy it. In TV terms, that’s practically Shakespeare. Timeless.

I’m no comedy professional, but here are some thoughts about why the show has aged so well, and what make Lucy so good (besides Lucy herself, of course).

Lucy and Ricky don’t have kids (in the show). This makes all their marriage foibles more lighthearted. The stakes are lower. It makes for a smaller cast (basically just them, Fred, and Ethel as regulars). It means things are less complicated, and the show doesn’t have to deal with all the problems that come up when you have a multigenerational family involved. In that way, it’s almost like Seinfeld, but less bleak because they are not living in New York City.

The show doesn’t always tie up at the end. Unlike the later generations of sitcoms were infamous for, Lucy doesn’t try to “solve all the problems in half an hour.” Sometimes it does, especially in the sense that the characters’ relationships usually reconcile. But often, things just get more and more chaotic, and then end suddenly right at the most chaotic point. Here are some examples of how shows have ended in the season I watched with my kids. Lucy is in tears because she got on the cover of Life magazine dressed as a hillbilly. All the extra meat, which Lucy hid in the building’s furnace (long story), has just been accidentally cooked. Lucy’s increasing efforts to get Ricky to stop ignoring her have escalated until she is dressed as Carmen Miranda.

The men and women are different. Different from each other, that is. Nay, they are stereotypes. And by stereotypes I mean the old-fashioned kind, not the generally much less pleasant modern kind. Ricky and Fred, though perfectly capable of cracking wise, are basically straight-man types who just want to go to work, come home, and eat a good steak. Lucy, while not dumb, is obviously a bit flaky, and prone to take a random idea and run it all the way out to its ridiculous conclusion. And her friend, Ethel, is usually willing to encourage her in this. These stereotypes of men and women stopped being used in entertainment, frankly, before I was born. Or at least before I started watching TV. By the time I tuned in, the women were all super smart, capable, and morally serious, and the men were either their sidekicks, the villains, or the incompetent weights they had to drag around.

Now, I strongly dislike being treated like I’m not capable. But for comedy at least, I’ve got to say, Lucy’s stereotypes of men and women are both funny and refreshing. I actually did not realize that being “the zany one” was even a role that was available to me, much less that such a character could be beloved and not an object of contempt. Ricky seldom loses his temper (beyond an eye roll), and he always still seems to respect Lucy, even when she has (in my view) humiliated herself. The standards are a little lower for respect in Lucy. You don’t have to be genius, perfect, or even competent all the time.

5 thoughts on “I Really Do Love Lucy

  1. BGCT2VA

    Jennifer,
    I Love Lucy will continue to be watched as long as people enjoy real comedy. Unlike Seinfeld, which, too, is often funny, there is no undertone of meanness or narcissism in Lucy. Of course, the pervasive promiscuity in Seinfeld is also absent in, I Love Lucy.
    But, I disagree with you on one point ( I too am shocked!) and that is your comment: “The standards are a little lower for respect in Lucy. You don’t have to be genius, perfect, or even competent all the time.” I would suggest that the standards for Respect in Lucy and in as much as they were a reflection of the times, were perhaps higher than more contemporary standards.
    Now, I’m not suggesting that the 50’s and (early) 60’s were without troubling issues. But, there was an expected degree of “respect” to be shown to everyone regardless whether they were geniuses, high-achievers, or just plain folk. And, if memory serves me well, women and girls were to be treated with the greatest respect always. For those that forgot that, they were considered to be pretty low.
    Anyway, keep watching Lucy. You may find that some of the issues you thought were missing in the domestic situation do emerge and are dealt with “Lucy style”.
    I really enjoy your posts.
    Bill

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Oh no no no, you are right! The standards for showing respect to others are higher in Lucy. But if you turn that around and look at it from the other end, this means the standards are lower for receiving respect. Lucy doesn’t have to be the smartest or toughest person in the room, or bring in a second income. All she has to do is exist and be Ricky’s wife. I agree that this baseline level of respect for women and girls was something that was present in 50s society, which in some other ways was arguably sexist. Ironically, feminism pretty much destroyed that and now, many women get the message that they must be high-level achievers.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s