“Massive stone structures in Saudi Arabia may be some of the oldest monuments in the world.”
They number in the hundreds, can be larger than an NFL football field and are found across Saudi Arabia. … radiocarbon dating of charcoal found within one of the structures indicates people built it around 5,000 B.C.
“This ‘monumental landscape’ represents one of the earliest large-scale forms of monumental stone structure construction anywhere in the world.”
Ibid
Oooh, so many thoughts.
We keep finding these things everywhere. And every time one is found, it’s older than expected, such that it seems we are constantly being told that “the earliest” or “one of the earliest” has just been found.
There is Gobekli Tepe in Turkey, the earliest (?) stone temple.
There are standing stones, marching stones, and stone circles all over the Middle East and Europe.
There are crannogs in Scotland (apparently Neolithic), and the Stone Serpent of Loch Nell.
The Giza pyramids, and the Sphinx, are arguably much older than commonly believed.
So, I don’t necessarily believe that these monuments in Saudi Arabia are “the first” of anything (even though, I’d like to point out, the monument could be older than the charcoal they found in it).
What I do believe is that they are yet more evidence that the compulsion to build massive stone structures, and the engineering skills to pull it off, was near universal among ancient humanity.
It looks most probable to me that these “earliest monuments” in Arabia were contemporaneous, or nearly so, with the other “earliest stone monuments” and temples and things that we keep finding, all over the world.
Perhaps people were dispersing from somewhere (somewhere near the Fertile Crescent, say), taking this building culture with them as they went. They would have hit northwest Arabia fairly quickly. The Table of Nations, in Genesis 10, lists all the peoples that descended from Noah’s three sons after the Flood. Though this is supposedly a comprehensive list, when it tells where they settled, the homelands listed for them are all in the Fertile Crescent, the Levant, and Arabia, though it is obvious that some of these peoples eventually ended up settling in much more far-flung places.
See also my posts about The Lost Civilizations of the Stone Age, by Richard Rudgley, who presents evidence that fully functioning human civilizations existed 10,000, 20,000, or even 30,000 years ago.
Just a thought for the day.
Thanks Jen. What it says to me is that these ancient peoples had a sense of awe and wonderment about the world they encountered that could only be explained by some supernatural power or being that created it. They all had different versions of it, after anthropomorphic, and ego-centric of course, but the basics were the same.
And now modern civilization is losing that awe and wonderment. To our peril.
Tom
>
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are probably right. We don’t know what these football field things were used for, of course, and it’s kind of become a cliche that when we don’t know what something was for, we conclude it had a religious purpose … but there are good reasons for that conclusion, based on our general knowledge of humanity.
LikeLike
It is easy to be in awe of ancient monuments ~ maybe it is our inability to believe the truth that civilisations existed centuries ago in the most unexpected areas. I’ve just stumbled on your earlier article about the sons of Noah and the theories about the founding of the main civilisations ~ fascinating Jennifer. I look forward to your series even though you wished you had based it on a different theory!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Diana, and glad you found the article about the sons of Noah! It continues to attract a trickle of blog readers every week.
LikeLike
very interesting
LikeLiked by 1 person